# MAB relaunch meeting notes Apr 25, 2019

**URL:** <https://community.modx.com/t/mab-relaunch-meeting-notes-apr-25-2019/663>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [April 25, 2019, 4:29pm UTC](https://community.modx.com/t/mab-relaunch-meeting-notes-apr-25-2019/663 "2019-04-25T16:29:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rthrash](https://community.modx.com/user_avatar/community.modx.com/rthrash/32/8_2.png) [@rthrash](https://community.modx.com/u/rthrash)\
**Post date:** [April 25, 2019, 4:29pm UTC](https://community.modx.com/t/mab-relaunch-meeting-notes-apr-25-2019/663/1 "2019-04-25T16:29:58Z")

</div>

## Attendees

- Christian Seel
- Gauke Pieter Sietzema
- Ivan Klimchuk
- Mat Jones
- Jason Coward
- Mark Hamstra
- Philip Harvey
- Ryan Thrash
- Gerben van de Kraats

### Absent with notice:

- Thomas Jakobi
- Joshua Luckers

### Absent without notice:

- None, yay!

## Agenda

- Introduction
- A new task description for the MAB and its members
- There was already an application form:[https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe6cmF4hMET-iCA1G83Uy9rLkG7u3mLBXx5EwZmfUcnDsvenA/viewform](https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe6cmF4hMET-iCA1G83Uy9rLkG7u3mLBXx5EwZmfUcnDsvenA/viewform) (Who applied?)
- Who’s in for a 2nd term?
- Define new responsibilities/roles in the MAB

# Notes

- Previous in-person meeting after the last Amsterdam meet-up:  
[https://kenniscentrum.census.nl/download/attachments/55672953/29-03-2019%20-%20MODX%20Amsterdam%20-%20Aftermeeting-v12-20190402\_224103.pdf?api=v2](https://kenniscentrum.census.nl/download/attachments/55672953/29-03-2019%20-%20MODX%20Amsterdam%20-%20Aftermeeting-v12-20190402_224103.pdf?api=v2)
- Use the Governance category in [community.modx.com](https://community.modx.com/c/governance) for published notes.

## Should we have another MAB?

- As discussed at the previous Amsterdam meetup, there’s agreement that we should have some project management, but it’s not clear if that should be called a MAB or something else
- Another idea from Ryan: regional “hubs” with representation from different regions/communities
- Burn the current MAB charter with fire

General consensus: yes, but much less administrative overhead with shared responsibilities and minimum commitment of time.

## Goals for the MAB going forward

### Roadmap and communication about it (primary purpose of the MAB v2.0)

- How in-depth? Technical?
- Original recommendations can be a big part of this
- Need Community-to-MAB communications more clearly and consistently … they are the silent majority and there’s no clear
- To define a roadmap the needs from the community need to understand (surveys etc)
- Milestones ([3.0.0-alpha](https://github.com/modxcms/revolution/milestone/39))
- Big hurdle: 10-year+ old technology modernization with only minimal breakage was the intention, but … lots of shortcuts taken in the current plan that ultimately break a lot of backward compatibilities anyway … the technical debt burden.
- Need to focus on “smaller” feature releases instead of massive efforts
- Github is a huge list of wants/wishes with no prioritization. When it bugs someone enough to solve them, they do so, but there’s no guidelines/guidance in place to ensure they’ll be adopted.
  - PR rejections: need clearer guidelines on the general philosophy (core vs Extras, e.g.) … that said it doesn’t happen that frequently … provide more guidance on how to do it inline with the philosophy

- Start small, with people that can devote time to Roadmap development. Should not be 1 or 2 people responsible for all the docs, and heavy lifting.
- Coordinate release of 3.0
- New Manager … how as it’s going to be hard (post 3)? Needs a working group.

### Structure

- Charter: trash and start over … too much overhead for volunteers?
- ~10-12 members? Do we limit membership count?
- Defining responsibilities with rotating secretary role
- Minimum contributions in hours per week?
- 3-person chair group for addressing disputes/membership?
- Working groups
  - In previous MAB, the person making a recommendation would also be responsible for the working group to make it happen. If that person is busy, it doesn’t get done.
  - Ideally, people outside the MAB take/are given responsibility for getting it done

- Gerben—collect / solicit money for rewards for heavy contributors, eg, money or merchandise, [OpenCollective](https://opencollective.com/)may be a solution (Christian)

## Future steps/actions/meetings

- Next Meeting Agenda: Roadmap including current problems and extension
- 3 hours block for next meeting—please plan to attend the entire time and focus
- Anyone who wishes to attend future meetings can (unless it becomes a problem)
- Funding efforts (especially Security)

Thursday standing meeting:

- Next on May 2 at [9:30AM Central (UTC-5)](https://time.is/compare/0930AM_2_May_2019_in_CT/Prague/Auckland/London/New_York/Denver/San_Francisco/Hawaii/Tokyo/Sydney/Iceland/Chennai/Novosibirsk/Moscow/Kyiv/Dubai/Shanghai/Bangkok/Cape_Town/S%C3%A3o_Paulo) (see the link to compare timezones)
- Link for the next Zoom meeting: [https://zoom.us/j/101652664](https://zoom.us/j/101652664)
- Find your local number (dial-in voice-only): [https://zoom.us/u/aBFnDNueo](https://zoom.us/u/aBFnDNueo)
- Agenda: briefly discuss chair board (3 people and who they might be), and then dive in on 3.0 review/roadmap

## Recording

[https://zoom.us/recording/share/xbOq19ru4o0srvJIXlzkgWbUk78fi\_9Cc4RzKXv18t6wIumekTziMw](https://zoom.us/recording/share/xbOq19ru4o0srvJIXlzkgWbUk78fi_9Cc4RzKXv18t6wIumekTziMw)
